Loading
What fits your constraints
Read 2 hours agoSet what you need and this says what is left. More usefully, it says what your constraints removed and why. A cross means we measured it and it did not meet your figure. A dash means we have not measured it at all, which is not the same thing and is the commonest answer on several of these columns.
A small result is often a statement about our data rather than about the market. Most of what any constraint removes here is vaults nobody has measured, not vaults that failed, so the panels below count those two apart and name the reading that is missing on the most vaults.
Nothing here is advice. There are no allocation percentages, no expected returns, and no ranking: the rows are in the order you choose, and no cell is marked as the winner. The address bar follows what you set, so a screen can be sent to somebody and they will see the one you saw, and any result can be taken away as CSV or handed straight to Compare.
In scope
3,797
vaults before any constraint
Confirmed matches
306
every active constraint measured and met
Measured and failed
2,950
we looked, and they did not meet it
Removed unmeasured
541
never measured, not failed
Where the scope went
confirmedmeasured and failednever measured
Largest coverage gap: Size test is unread on 1,175 of the 3,797 vaults in scope. Counted on its own, not in the order the funnel applies, so it is not flattered or blamed for being first.
What your constraints removed
In the order the controls are listed. A vault removed at one step is not counted again at the next, so the two columns on the right always add up to the drop on that line. Krystal Auto-Farm Vault alone is 58% of the vaults in scope and 0% of their capital, so read the count column as that cohort’s count and the capital column as the market’s.
| Constraint | Asked for | Left | Capital left | Platforms | Failed it | Not measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Every open vault | nothing yet | 3,797 | $11.44bn | 34 | — | — |
| Would take a deposit | would accept a deposit from an address with no special standing | 899 | $4.51bn* | 15 | −2,402 | −496 |
| Size test | holds at least $100k | 358 | $4.50bn | 15 | −499 | −42 |
| Days watched | has been under observation for 90 days | 306 | $3.87bn | 14 | −49 | −3 |
306 vaults meet all of it, holding $3.87bn between them.
The constraint costing you the most
How many more vaults would meet everything else if this one alone were switched off. Computed by re-running the whole screen without it, so nothing is promised that a later constraint would remove anyway.
- +312
- +289
- +52
What is leftsorted by size, which is not a ranking
✓ meets it✕ does not meet it– not measured
| Select for comparison | Would take a deposit | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concrete · CTDELTAWEETH Concrete · Ethereum · Concrete | $736.6m | 3/3 | yesWould take a deposit: meets it | $736.6mSize test: meets it | 249d watched · returns over 248dDays watched: meets it | |
| Spark USDC Vault Morpho · Base · SparkDAO | $416.3m | 3/3 | yesWould take a deposit: meets it | $416.3mSize test: meets it | 185d watched · returns over 184dDays watched: meets it | |
| Gauntlet USDC Prime Morpho · Base · Gauntlet | $412.9m | 3/3 | yesWould take a deposit: meets it | $412.9mSize test: meets it | 213d watched · returns over 63dDays watched: meets it | |
| Gauntlet x Lista BNB Vault Lista Lending · BSC · Gauntlet | $354.9m | 3/3 | yesWould take a deposit: meets it | $354.9mSize test: meets it | 246d watched · returns over 246dDays watched: meets it | |
| 1337 USDC Morpho · Ethereum | $330.3m | 3/3 | yesWould take a deposit: meets it | $330.3mSize test: meets it | 249d watched · returns over 63dDays watched: meets it | |
| Gauntlet x Lista USD1 Vault Lista Lending · BSC · Gauntlet | $138.2m | 3/3 | yesWould take a deposit: meets it | $138.2mSize test: meets it | 246d watched · returns over 246dDays watched: meets it | |
| Steakhouse USDC Morpho · Base · Steakhouse Financial | $119.1m | 3/3 | yesWould take a deposit: meets it | $119.1mSize test: meets it | 213d watched · returns over 63dDays watched: meets it | |
| Avant avUSD · SAVUSD Avant avUSD · Avalanche · Avant avUSD | $100.8m | 3/3 | yesWould take a deposit: meets it | $100.8mSize test: meets it | 386d watched · returns over 28dDays watched: meets it | |
| HLP Strategy X Hyperliquid · Hyperliquid · HLP | $100.6m | 3/3 | yesWould take a deposit: meets it | $100.6mSize test: meets it | 299d watched · returns over 299dDays watched: meets it | |
| Steakhouse USDT Morpho · Ethereum · Steakhouse Financial | $77.4m | 3/3 | yesWould take a deposit: meets it | $77.4mSize test: meets it | 249d watched · returns over 248dDays watched: meets it | |
| Steakhouse USDC Morpho · Ethereum · Steakhouse Financial | $64.5m | 3/3 | yesWould take a deposit: meets it | $64.5mSize test: meets it | 249d watched · returns over 248dDays watched: meets it | |
| LisUSD Vault Lista Lending · BSC · Lista DAO | $58.0m | 3/3 | yesWould take a deposit: meets it | $58.0mSize test: meets it | 246d watched · returns over 246dDays watched: meets it | |
| Gauntlet x Lista U Vault Lista Lending · BSC · Gauntlet | $45.0m | 3/3 | yesWould take a deposit: meets it | $45.0mSize test: meets it | 246d watched · returns over 246dDays watched: meets it | |
| Hyperliquidity Provider (HLP) Hyperliquid · Hyperliquid · Hyperliquidity Provider (HLP) | $39.0m | 3/3 | yesWould take a deposit: meets it | $39.0mSize test: meets it | 1258d watched · returns over 1258dDays watched: meets it | |
| HLP Liquidator 2 Hyperliquid · Hyperliquid · HLP | $30.0m | 3/3 | yesWould take a deposit: meets it | $30.0mSize test: meets it | 544d watched · returns over 544dDays watched: meets it | |
| Concrete · CTRWA-USD1 Concrete · Ethereum · Concrete | $28.3m | 3/3 | yesWould take a deposit: meets it | $28.3mSize test: meets it | 102d watched · returns over 102dDays watched: meets it | |
| Avant avETH · SAVETH Avant avETH · Ethereum · Avant avETH | $25.7m | 3/3 | yesWould take a deposit: meets it | $25.7mSize test: meets it | 357d watched · returns over 204dDays watched: meets it | |
| Concrete · CTWBTC Concrete · Berachain · Concrete | $24.0m | 3/3 | yesWould take a deposit: meets it | $24.0mSize test: meets it | 220d watched · returns over 219dDays watched: meets it | |
| Gauntlet USDC Prime Morpho · Ethereum · Gauntlet | $23.8m | 3/3 | yesWould take a deposit: meets it | $23.8mSize test: meets it | 249d watched · returns over 248dDays watched: meets it | |
| Concrete · THUSD-USDC-ETH Concrete · Ethereum · Concrete | $20.5m | 3/3 | yesWould take a deposit: meets it | $20.5mSize test: meets it | 228d watched · returns over 227dDays watched: meets it |
286 more matches holding $719.6m are not listed here. Analyst opens the full result, the comparison and the export.
Why a column is a dash
- Would take a deposit: read for 3,301 of 3,797. neither witness answered: maxDeposit is an ERC-4626 call a non-4626 vault cannot make, and this vault’s venue publishes no deposit flag either.
- Size test: read for 2,622 of 3,797. nothing in this vault has a price we can read, so its size is unknown rather than zero.
- Days watched: read for 3,368 of 3,797. we hold no observation of this vault yet, so there is no span to measure.
- Age: read for 3,400 of 3,797. we hold no creation record for this vault, which is common where it was not found from a factory event.
- Risk score: read for 1,086 of 3,797. not enough of the inputs are read on this vault to score it.
- Worst fall: read for 800 of 3,797. the series is shorter than a quarter, or the figure is the venue’s own over a window it does not state, and neither is a drawdown.
- Crowding: read for 656 of 3,797. we hold no market-size figure to divide this vault’s exposure by, which is what a crowd without a denominator is missing.
- Delivers its quote: read for 417 of 3,797. the venue’s rate and what the price did cannot be put side by side here.
- Performance fee: read for 1,265 of 3,797. neither witness answered: no fee call this reader knows, and the venue publishes no figure for what the manager takes.
- Withdrawable now: read for 793 of 3,797. this vault does not lend, or its free liquidity has not been read.
- Time to exit: read for 353 of 3,797. this venue states no redemption period, and on a lending vault there is none to state: getting out depends on when a borrower repays.
- Shared implementation: read for 377 of 3,797. this vault is not a proxy, or its implementation slot has not been read.
- Control arrangement: read for 479 of 3,797. who controls this vault has not been read, or it governs through a shape our reader does not answer.
- Manager is a named firm: read for 3,797 of 3,797. never: a firm record exists or it does not.
- Names what it deploys into: read for 3,797 of 3,797. never: the vault answered with a list, or it did not answer.
- Operator identified: read for 3,797 of 3,797. never: an operator is either linked or it is not.